(no subject)
Feb. 10th, 2004 09:52 amI think it's time to get my eyes checked, and probably get glasses or contacts.
Boston-folk, can you recommend a good place?
Everyone, what do you think: glasses or contacts? And, if glasses, round lenses? Those little rectangles?
Gah. One of the reasons I've put this off for so long is how much I hate making decisions like this.
Boston-folk, can you recommend a good place?
Everyone, what do you think: glasses or contacts? And, if glasses, round lenses? Those little rectangles?
Gah. One of the reasons I've put this off for so long is how much I hate making decisions like this.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:07 am (UTC)glasses are hot. you should get glasses =) teehee
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:21 am (UTC)Pearl Vision was my favorite back in Delaware, but the only Pearl I could find up here was over in a scary shopping center not nearly close enough to the Cambridgeside Galleria.
Having had contacts for many years in college and grad school, I find that I now prefer glasses. One big reason: low maintenance. Also, if you have an astigmatism, you may find that you prefer glasses too; the astigmatism can cause your contacts to not adhere as nicely to your eyeball as you'd like, making them easy to pop off or fold in your eye if you blink wrong or don't blink enough. If your eyes are dry, you may want to avoid contacts. I had to learn a whole new blinking frequency to keep them wet when I got mine because I was working on a computer all day long (which was mighty unusual and hard to explain to my ophthamologist back in 1986, lemme tellya) or doing microscopy, which was nearly as bad. (Although I lurved the contacts for microscopy purposes.)
If you get contacts, get yourself an inexpensive pair of glasses that you don't hate as backup for when (note that I say "when") you damage/lose/run out of contacts.
Also, er, you're approaching your mid-30s. Given a choice, I go to an actual ophthamologist (MD) rather than an optician (not MD) because I'm now in the age bracket for risks from glaucoma and diabetes and Other Stuff, and I'd rather have an MD looking at my eyeballs for signs of Bad Things, and who can, if there's something weird, just order up the appropriate tests rather than getting me all alarmed and having to wait for an ophthamologist to have a chance to look at me, blah blah blah.
For me, in the end, the only big advantages on the contacts side of things are: 1) able to see the clock in the middle of the night, 2) less in the way of dark circles under my eyes. But I'm blind as a bat without corrective lenses. You, however, have your theatrical pursuits, which may make contacts a must. (Although, hum, hrm, fire-eating in contacts? Fire-eating in glasses? Hrm. Me, I'd rather have the safety glass between me and the fire.)
See? I'm all opinionated and stuff about eye correction. Comes from wearing glasses for the past... er... 28 years or so.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:26 am (UTC)As for the glasses vs. contacts debate...it's so personal. I used to wear glasses, not because I preferred them, but because I was too lazy to take care of my contacts properly. Back then there was all the solution, rinse, repeat, once a week do an intensive cleaning thing...Now, however, I use the rub-free saline and it's a piece of cake.
For myself, I much prefer contacts. I find them more comfortable, less intrusive, and I have peripheral vision. And I don't have to decide between doing a faire in glasses or doing it half-blind.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:35 am (UTC)If you want to have some fun, check out this site: http://www.eyeglasses.com/information/using/index.page
you can upload a picture of yourself and then try on various shapes and makes of glasses.
BTW, thanks for writing this cause you reminded me to set up my next appointment with my doc :) Maybe i'll go back to purple glasses this time. Hmm...
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:44 am (UTC)Contacts. You'll wonder why you didn't get them sooner.
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 07:48 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-10 07:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 08:20 am (UTC)Anyway, yeah, both. :)
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 08:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 09:09 am (UTC)That said, you will need to have glasses as a backup to contact lenses, especially if you don't get constant-wear disposables, which is what I have. They're supposed to be worn a week, even during sleeping, taken out once to be cleaned and then worn another week. And then, thrown away. Mind you, I'm cheap, and I'll wear them for a couple of months before I throw them away -- as long as I'm careful to keep the cleaning schedule, they're fine.
no subject
no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 09:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-02-10 05:35 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2004-02-11 05:38 pm (UTC)