Ooh, I'm not touching that one with a ten-foot pole. I've heard that one nearly reach shouting-match levels.
But then, I distinctly recall doing Hemingway in college. We read the assignment as usual and filed into the classroom. The first thing the professor said before opening the floor for discussion was "First, I want to apologize on behalf of my discipline for making you read that."
Four men in the class looked incredibly uncomfortable just then. The rest of them and all the women breathed a huge sigh of relief.
So you can never really know. There is no Good and Bad literature, there is only Poetry and Pop-Poetry.
No surprise, but I go with the former. Moby Dick is one of my all-time favorites.
It was my introduction to allegory in literature and opened up a new way of enjoying books. Seeing beyond the literal meaning of the words on the page and finding out what the really mean. However, if Melville doesn't grab you early, in the book, I can see why many people don't like it.
I love that book because you can read it two different ways. If you arent into the allegorical stuff, you can read it at face value and still enjoy it.
I am with Cliff on this, I love books with varying levels, and the underbelly of this novel is filled with amazing imagery. In some ways this makes me think of red Badge of Courage, which I hated reading ubtill my brother pointed out the Christian symbolism, then it was like reading a mystery, unlocking the clues...
LOL. You want to see really crazy - go to the New Bedford whaling museum when they read it from start to finish with a whole host of guest readers - everyone takes a one hour chunk.
I opened the book in grade 7 or 8 english and promptly got the cliff notes version. Hated it, but that was also the year that we did the Great Gatsby, Scarlette Letter, and some other craptastic (IMO) books
I read somewhere that it was an American classic so I borrowed it from the library. Then I desided it was really boring, was glad I wasn't an American and had to read it and read the Brothers Karamasov in stead.
The fact that was about 14 at the time may account for something though.
Read it, liked it on many levels. But He's still a crazy man hunting a very large mammal. But then again they where all crazy men hunting large mammals.
HEE. Your discussion question cracks me up. Sadly, I haven't read Moby Dick, so I can't contribute. However, in the same vein, I say:
Billy Budd: Chock-full of descriptions and celebrations of classical male beauty, or thin veneer of storyline over expressions of Melville's supressed homoerotic urges?
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 12:19 pm (UTC)But then, I distinctly recall doing Hemingway in college. We read the assignment as usual and filed into the classroom. The first thing the professor said before opening the floor for discussion was "First, I want to apologize on behalf of my discipline for making you read that."
Four men in the class looked incredibly uncomfortable just then. The rest of them and all the women breathed a huge sigh of relief.
So you can never really know. There is no Good and Bad literature, there is only Poetry and Pop-Poetry.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 12:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 12:45 pm (UTC)It was my introduction to allegory in literature and opened up a new way of enjoying books. Seeing beyond the literal meaning of the words on the page and finding out what the really mean.
However, if Melville doesn't grab you early, in the book, I can see why many people don't like it.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 12:53 pm (UTC)It is an anology of the death of the whaling man/life and yes, he gets P0wned by a cetacean.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 01:43 pm (UTC)or one long-ass book about a whale pwning an insane guy?
Now I'm imaging Captian Ahab shouting out "OMG Hax!" as he is dragged away by the whale.
Natch, the whale would respond "STFU I OWN JOO!!!11oneuno"
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 02:49 pm (UTC)Sometimes, when you start speaking in tongues like this, I look back and think, "I dated him?"
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 02:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 02:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 04:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 04:49 pm (UTC)They do it. Every. Single. Year.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 05:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 05:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 06:50 pm (UTC)[Kosh] Yes. [/Kosh]
no subject
Date: 2006-04-05 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-06 03:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-04 09:33 pm (UTC)The fact that was about 14 at the time may account for something though.
no subject
Date: 2006-04-05 06:34 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-04-13 07:37 pm (UTC)Billy Budd: Chock-full of descriptions and celebrations of classical male beauty, or thin veneer of storyline over expressions of Melville's supressed homoerotic urges?
Discuss.